The Do No Significant Harm principle is a novelty in Horizon Europe. The broader application of the principle must be preceded by a thorough assessment of its implementation in the Horizon Europe, as the ongoing programme.ĭo No Significant Harm and Horizon Europe, the context to date.If the principle becomes an obligation for all framework programme projects, including in Horizon Europe’s Pillar I and for projects with lower technology readiness levels (TRLs) in Pillar II, researchers may struggle to undertake certain types of (fundamental) research.There are no clear guidelines on how the principle should be implemented in practical terms.The broader application of the principle must not come at the cost of additional burden for researchers. EUA has advocated for programme simplification for many years. The introduction of the Do No Significant Harm principle creates an additional administrative burden and adds to the complexity of project proposals and evaluations.Together with CESAER and Science Europe, the Association calls for the European Parliament to support amendment 165*, which inserts important considerations concerning feasibility, appropriateness and proportionality. Therefore, EUA does not support the unconditional introduction of this principle in the regulation. ![]() Horizon Europe and any eventual successor programme), as foreseen in the European Commission’s proposal for the recast of the EU Financial Regulation, is still premature. However, broadening the application of the Do No Significant Harm principle to all projects under European R&I framework programmes (i.e. The European University Association (EUA) fully supports the environmental objectives outlined in the EU’s sustainable finance taxonomy regulation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |